Skip to main content

Transaxillary (Scarless) Breast Augmentation: Pros and Cons, Recovery & Results – Expert Guide

Posted June 29, 2026 in Scarless Breast Augmentation

image of woman showing clean armpit area after transaxillary breast augmentation incision placement

Why Patients are Choosing “Scarless” Breast Augmentation

If you’re researching breast augmentation with no visible breast scars, the transaxillary (armpit) approach for breast augmentation has become one of the most searched and patient-requested techniques in aesthetic breast surgery. 

This technique allows implants to be placed through a hidden incision in the armpit, leaving the breast itself completely untouched. For patients who want natural-looking results without any trace of surgery on their breast, this single benefit is a deciding factor.

But like any advanced surgical technique, it comes with important advantages, tradeoffs and candidacy considerations that deserve understanding.

This comprehensive, surgeon-led guide is designed to help patients researching the scarless incision technique:

  • Understand how transaxillary breast augmentation works
  • Compare it to other incision methods
  • Evaluate real clinical outcomes and benefits
  • Decide if you are a strong candidate
  • Choose a surgeon with the right expertise
  • Read about Dr. Lo’s proprietary patient outcome data

What Is Transaxillary Breast Augmentation?

Transaxillary or scarless breast augmentation is a technique where a plastic surgeon makes a small incision in the natural crease of the armpit (axilla).  Through this access point, a precise space or pocket is created and the implant is placed behind the chest muscle (subpectoral or dual plane) of the natural breast.

When performed with endoscopic assistance (camera-guided surgery), this technique allows for:

  • High-precision pocket creation
  • Symmetrical implant positioning
  • Minimal cutting resulting in reduced trauma to breast tissue

Because the transaxillary approach keeps the surgical incision entirely away from the breast, it is commonly referred to as scarless breast augmentation

The Pros of the Transaxillary Approach

The axillary technique offers well-documented advantages for the right patient.

No Visible Scars on the Breast

The biggest advantage is completely avoiding scars on the breast. The breast augmentation incision is:

  • Hidden in the natural fold of the armpit, where it fades over time
  • Invisible in low-cut clothing or swimwear
  • Ideal for patients prioritizing aesthetics and do not want visible evidence of surgery on their breast

Less Surgical Trauma and Preserves Natural Breast Tissue and Anatomy

The implant pocket is created through the armpit so the dissection does not pass through breast tissue. This reduces trauma to the breast mound during the procedure and supports a cleaner pocket creation.

Preserved Milk Ducts

Unlike other approaches:

  • No incision through breast tissue
  • No disruption of mammary gland tissue and milk ducts
  • Maintains tissue integrity for future breastfeeding and imaging

This benefit is important for patients concerned about future breastfeeding or maintaining mammogram accuracy by preserving the tissue baseline that imaging relies on.

Lower Risk of Nipple Sensation Changes

Avoiding incisions near the areola lowers the risk of nerve disruption and the likelihood of temporary or permanent changes in nipple sensation, a common concern patients raise during consultations.

Compatible with All Modern Saline and Silicone Implants

The transaxillary or armpit  approach accommodates both saline and silicone and gummy bear  implants, giving patients full flexibility in their implant choice.The armpit approach can accommodate the smallest implant up to 800 cc or larger.

Reduced Capsular Contracture Risk (In Expert Hands)

Capsular contracture, the development of firm scar tissue around an implant, is an uncommon complication of breast augmentation, with published rates ranging from 1.3% to 1.9%. 

Because the transaxillary approach avoids cutting through breast tissue, there is lower bacterial exposure to the implant pocket and potentially reduced capsular contracture rates.

Dr. Lo’s ten-year review of transaxillary breast augmentation (2016 – 2025) cases confirmed that no revision surgeries were performed for Baker Grade 3 or 4 severe capsular contracture.

Strong Aesthetic Results

Endoscopic visualization allows for direct, controlled pocket creation, supporting symmetrical placement and a natural-looking result.  This is especially beneficial for:

  • Patients with minimal natural breast tissue
  • Those seeking natural upper pole contour and implant coverage

Implants are placed 100% subpectoral or in the dual plane position behind the chest muscle can result in:

  • Softer appearance
  • Reduced wrinkling and rippling
  • Less chance of capsular contracture
  • Better long-term shape
  • Increased accuracy of mammograms

Strong Long-Term Patient Outcomes: Clinical Data Advantage

According to a peer-reviewed study published on PubMed, a 25-year review of 1,015 consecutive transaxillary breast implant placement cases demonstrated long-term safety with an average patient follow-up of over 77 months, supporting an established clinical track record.

Dr. Lo’s own five-year chart review of 555 scarless breast augmentation patients (January 2021 to December 2025) recorded a hematoma rate of just 0.03%, zero cases of capsular contracture, zero permanent arm sensory changes, and an overall revision rate of 4.8% — outcomes that compare favorably against three decades of published studies by Giordano, Tebbetts, and Mills and position Dr. Lo among top-tier specialists in this technique.

The best way to evaluate any plastic surgeon is to see the results. Browse Dr. Lo’s scarless breast augmentation before-and-after gallery to see real patient outcomes.

The Cons – Potential Downsides of the Transaxillary Approach (And Why Surgeon Skill Matters)

An evaluation of the armpit breast augmentation incision requires acknowledging its limitations.

Higher Technical Complexity and Specialized Training Requirements

This is not a beginner procedure.  

The endoscope-assisted transaxillary approach requires a plastic surgeon with advanced training in endoscopic techniques. Surgeons work at a distance from the breast pocket and precision is critical. Outcomes are highly plastic surgeon-dependent.

Limited Surgeon Availability

Most board-certified plastic surgeons do not offer this technique, which means selecting a plastic surgeon trained in this method requires research. 

Dr. Adrian Lo is among a select group of very few plastic surgeons in Philadelphia and the country performing endoscopic transaxillary augmentation and one of the few offering this technique with subpectoral or dual plane placement using a funnel technique for implant insertion.

Specialized Equipment Required

The transaxillary approach requires dedicated endoscopic equipment, including an endoscope, breast retractor, video camera head, and electrocautery dissector, which is not standard in every surgical setting. Plastic surgeons need to operate in a facility equipped specifically for endoscopic breast surgery.

Successful outcomes also are dependent on the plastic surgeon’s technical expertise, endoscopic equipment and an experienced operating room team.

Greater Technical Complexity

Working at a distance from the breast pocket through the transaxillary dual-plane breast augmentation corridor increases operative complexity and extends surgery time under anesthesia for plastic surgeons not experienced in the technique of transaxillary breast augmentation. Management of certain complications may be more complex.

Who Is a Good Candidate for Transaxillary Breast Augmentation?

This breast augmentation technique is well-suited to a specific patient profile, and understanding that profile helps patients self-screen before booking a consultation. This is also a procedure where surgeon selection carries real weight. Dr. Adrian Lo’s recognition as one of America’s Best Plastic Surgeons serves as a strong indicator of his qualifications and expertise, particularly when evaluating whether a specialist has the expertise required by this technically demanding procedure.

Good candidate indicators include patients who:

  • Place a high value on a breast appearance and want no visible breast scars
  • Are first-time augmentation patients
  • Have moderate implant size goals
  • Good axillary /armpit anatomy to support the corridor approach
  • Prioritizes natural-looking results

Less ideal candidates include patients:

  • Need a breast lift (mastopexy)
  • Seeking very large implants
  • Those requiring complex pocket adjustments such as a breast lift with implants
  • Patients with limited axillary anatomy

What Dr. Lo’s Scarless Breast Augmentation Patient Data Shows

Most discussions of transaxillary breast augmentation rely on general published literature. What follows comes from Dr. Lo’s own five-year chart review of 555 consecutive transaxillary breast augmentation patients performed between January 2021 and December 2025.

Dr. Lo’s own 5-year chart review from January 2021 to December 2025:

  • 733 breast augmentation patients
    • 76% chose the transaxillary approach
    • 24% chose the crease incision
  • Average age: 34.5 years with patients ranging from 16 to 70 
  • Average implant volume: 388 cc

The most common complication was implant positioning that was too high, occurring in 3.6% of cases, most of which were managed through the original transaxillary incision without requiring a separate crease approach. Axillary banding, a temporary subcutaneous lumpiness in the armpit area, occurred in 21.9% of patients but resolved universally without intervention within four to six weeks. 

Compared against three of the most widely cited published transaxillary studies, Dr. Lo’s outcomes are as follows:

ComplicationGiordano 2006 (n=306)Tebbetts 2007 (n=359)Mills 2010 (n=1,682)Lo 2026 (n=555)
Hematoma1%0.2%0.1%0.03%
Infection0.3%0.0%0.0%0.01%
Malposition3%0.2%2.97%3.0%
Capsular Contracture1.6%1.3%1.9%0.0%*
Revision/Reoperation6.2%3.3%13.4%4.8%

*Based on a five-year review period with an average follow-up of six months. A separate ten-year chart review (2016–2025) confirmed no revision surgeries were performed for Baker Grade 3 or 4 capsular contracture.

Quick Comparison: Transaxillary vs. Other Breast Augmentation Incisions 

No single incision approach works best for every patient. The table below outlines how the three most common methods compare across key decision factors.

FactorTransaxillary
(Armpit)
Inframammary
(Under Breast)
Periareolar
(Around Nipple)
Scar LocationArmpit crease: no scar on the breastBreast crease or foldAround the areola border
Scar VisibilityLow: hidden in the armpit crease, fades over time, almost invisibleLow to moderate: hidden in the breast crease or foldModerate — blends with the areola but is visible on the breast
Implant FlexibilityHigh. Accommodates both saline and silicone or Gummy Bear  implantsHighModerate
PlacementSubpectoral or dual plane, behind the chest muscleSubpectoral, dual plane, or over muscle/subglandularSubpectoral or over muscle/subglandular
Revision AccessMost revisional surgeries can be performed through the original transaxillary incisionHigh. Direct access to the implant pocketModerate
Breast Tissue DisruptionNone — no incision through breast tissue or milk ductsMinimalModerate — passes through milk ducts and glandular tissue
Best CandidatePatients prioritizing no visible scars on the breast, first-time augmentation, moderate implant sizeMost patients, including revision casesPatients with larger areola that prefer not to have the crease incision

Find Out If the Transaxillary Approach Is Right for You Today

Transaxillary endoscopically assisted breast augmentation offers a clinically proven option for patients who prioritize a breast free of visible surgical incisions or scars, with strong long-term clinical data supporting its safety. The trade-offs include a learning curve for the plastic surgeon, the need for specialized equipment, and more complex management of certain complications. However, an experienced plastic surgeon like Dr. Adrian Lo is equipped to manage these tradeoffs effectively. 

Why Patients Choose Dr. Adrian Lo

When patients search for:

  • “Best scarless breast augmentation surgeon”
  • “Transaxillary breast augmentation expert”
  • “No scar breast implants USA”

They are looking for experience-driven results and not just technique availability.

Dr. Lo’s Competitive Edge

  • He has performed endoscopically assisted transaxillary breast augmentation for over 25 years
  • He is one of the very few plastic surgeons in the Philadelphia, South Jersey region and the country offering this technique
  • Consistently low complication rates backed by data. His five-year chart review of 733 transaxillary patients recorded zero cases of capsular contracture and zero permanent arm sensory changes
  • He is dual board-certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
  • He has been recognized by Newsweek as one of America’s Best Plastic Surgeons in 2021, 2023, 2024, and 2025
  • Nurses and doctors choose Dr. Lo for their own cosmetic procedures, a reflection of peer-level clinical trust
  • Every surgical plan is personalized to the patient’s anatomy, goals, and timeline, not a one-size-fits-all protocol
  • Dr. Lo performs all procedures at Pennsylvania Hospital or Pennsylvania Hospital Surgery Center with physician anesthesiologists and two operating room nurses present at all times
  • Dr. Lo offers consultations at two locations, Philadelphia, PA, and Marlton, NJ, serving patients across Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.

Transaxillary breast augmentation offers one of the most natural and discreet approaches available today, but only in the hands of a highly experienced surgeon. 

If your priority is:

  • No visible breast scars
  • Natural contours
  • Proven long-term outcomes

This approach may be the best option for you.

A personalized consultation remains the most reliable path to determining whether this approach is the right fit for your anatomy and aesthetic goals. 

map of Dr. Adrian Lo plastic surgery locations in Philadelphia and Marlton NJ for transaxillary breast augmentation

Contact Us

Contact Us

Locations

Philadelphia Plastic Surgery

301 South 8th Street, Suite 3H,
Philadelphia PA 19106

New Jersey Plastic Surgery

990 Route 73 North
Marlton, NJ 08053

Social Media